Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 25;40(6):2910–2921. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12662

Figure 8. Choice probability of trials with distractor in receptive field in reaction-time task.

Figure 8

A. Population choice probability of Go trials for dlPFC (red, N=17) and LIP (blue, N=14) in which distractors were presented in the receptive field. Choice probability was computed using correct go trials (dlPFC: 160 trials, LIP: 140 trials) vs. miss trials (dlPFC: 134 trials, LIP:188 trials). Vertical lines indicate cue onset time and approximate duration of cue presentation. B. Population choice probability of NoGo trials using false alarm trials (dlPFC 106 trials, LIP: 86 trials) vs. correct NoGo trials (dlPFC: 320 trials, LIP: 280 trials). C. Population choice probabilities during 300 ms of fixation period and 300 ms of cue period (dlPFC: red, LIP: blue). Average choice probabilities were plotted separately for Go trials and NoGo trials for each period.