Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):718–726. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000475

Table 5.

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression of baseline characteristics associated with IUD expulsion stratified by IUD type*

Levonorgestrel IUD Copper IUD
N HR 95% CI N HR 95% CI
Age 14–19 years 439 2.26 1.68, 3.06 90 3.06 1.75, 5.33
Age ≥ 20 years 3780 Ref Ref 1094 Ref Ref
White/Other race 2192 Ref Ref 740 Ref Ref
Black race 2027 1.32 1.03, 1.68 444 0.92 0.56, 1.49
BMI <30 2776 Ref Ref 804 Ref Ref
BMI ≥ 30 1401 1.27 1.02, 1.60 366 1.16 0.72, 1.86
Married/living with a partner 1511 0.85 0.67, 1.08 483 0.91 0.58, 1.45
Single/separated/divorced/Widowed 2707 Ref Ref 699 Ref Ref
Low socioeconomic status 2445 1.48 1.13, 1.92 677 0.83 0.53, 1.31
Nulliparous 1690 0.59 0.44, 0.78 492 1.11 0.67, 1.84
Heavy periods 961 1.64 1.30, 2.06 205 1.73 1.08, 2.78
Immediate postabortion insertion 749 1.33 1.03, 1.71 168 1.01 0.55, 1.83
*

Model adjusted for age 14–19, race, obesity, marital status, low socioeconomic status, nulliparity, self-reported heavy periods, and immediate postabortion placement.

IUD – intrauterine device; BMI –body mass index;