Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 23;9(9):e108017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108017

Table 2. Results of the probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis for the base case scenario with an annual dengue incidence rate of 5.8%.

Intervention effectiveness Number of non-hospitalized DF cases averteda (95% CI) Cost per non-hospitalized DF cases avertedc (95% CI) Number of hospitalized DF cases averteda (95% CI) Cost per hospitalized DF cases avertedc (95% CI) Number of DHF cases averteda (95% CI) Cost per DHF case avertedb (95% CI) Number of DALYs averteda (95% CI) Cost per DALY avertedc (ICER) (95% CI)
Intervention cost: $2.5 per child per year
50% 11 (9−13) −33 (−69−9) 1 (1−1) −364 (−766 – 86) 2 (1−2) −275 (−507−65) 0.14 (0.12−0.18) Dominant
75% 16 (14−19) −110 (−136−−81) 2 (1−2) −1,212 (−1,487−−896) 2 (2−3) −808 (−1,005−−601) 0.22 (0.18−0.27) Dominant
100% 22 (19−25) −148 (−170−−125) 2 (2−2) −1,634 (−1,872−−1,388) 3 (3−3) −1,089 (−1,248−−930) 0.29 (0.24−0.35) Dominant
Intervention cost: $5 per child per year
50% 11 (9−13) 198 (130−278) 1 (1−1) 2,182 (1,422 – 3,064) 2 (1 – 2) 1,442 (986 – 2,018) 0.14 (0.12 – 0.18) 14,934 (9,662 – 21,498)
75% 16 (14 – 19) 44 (−3 – 97) 2 (1 – 2) 484 (−22 – 1,068) 2 (2−3) 319 (−20−695) 0.22 (0.17−0.27) 3,383 (−319 – 7,520)
100% 22 (19−25) −33 (−69−9) 2 (2−3) −364 (−756 – 88) 3 (3−3) −243 (−501−31) 0.29 (0.24−0.35) Dominant
Intervention cost: $10 per child per year
50% 11 (9−13) 659 (524−815) 1 (1−1) 7,285 (5,812 – 9,027) 2 (1−2) 4,879 (3,874 – 6,012) 0.15 (0.12−0.21) 49,480 (37,759 – 63,970)
75% 16 (14−19) 353 (262−457) 2 (1−2) 3,877 (2,887 – 5,029) 2 (2−3) 2,591 (2,919 – 3,335) 0.22 (0.17−0.27) 26,782 (19,342 – 35,487)
100% 22 (19−25) 198 (129−276) 2 (2−2) 2,188 (1,428 – 3,047) 3 (3−3) 1,455 (981 – 2,032) 0.29 (0.23 – 0.36) 14,937 (9.278 – 21,100)

(all costs are in US dollars for the year 2012).

DF = Dengue Fever; DHF = Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever; DALY = Disability-Adjusted Life Years; ICER = Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio.

a

Incremental health outcomes are presented per 1,000 children over one year.

b

Negative cost values indicate cost-savings.

c

Boldface font indicates scenarios that were cost-effective (ICER≤$16,440). Underlined entries in boldface font are scenarios in which the intervention was the dominant strategy (i.e. less costly and more effective than no intervention alternative).