Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):801–809. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000477

Table 2.

Associations between folate intake and clinical outcomes in 232 women (353 initiated cycles) from the Environment and Reproductive Health Study.

Implantation Rate Clinical Pregnancy Rate Live Birth Rate
Quartile (range, μg/day)
Adjusted Mean (95% CI)

Total Folate (in DFE)
 Q1 ((<1262) 0.46 (0.35, 0.57) 0.39 (0.29, 0.51) 0.30 (0.21, 0.42)
 Q2 (1262–1778) 0.62 (0.50, 0.72) 0.56 (0.44, 0.67)* 0.47 (0.35, 0.59)*
 Q3 ((1779–2352) 0.64 (0.51, 0.74)* 0.58 (0.46, 0.70)* 0.42 (0.30, 0.55)
 Q4 (>2352) 0.68 (0.57, 0.78)* 0.63 (0.52, 0.74)* 0.56 (0.43, 0.67)*
P trend 0.01 0.007 0.01
Supplemental Folate
 Q1 ((<400) 0.43 (0.31, 0.55) 0.41 (0.29, 0.53) 0.35 (0.24, 0.48)
 Q2 (400–543) 0.66 (0.55, 0.75)* 0.55 (0.44, 0.65) 0.43 (0.32, 0.54)
 Q3 (544–800) 0.58 (0.46, 0.70) 0.55 (0.42, 0.66) 0.39 (0.28, 0.52)
 Q4 ((>800) 0.67 (0.56, 0.77)* 0.62 (0.51, 0.73)* 0.55 (0.43, 0.66)*
P trend 0.03 0.03 0.07
Food Folate
 Q1 (<371) 0.58 (0.47, 0.69) 0.47 (0.36, 0.58) 0.35 (0.25, 0.47)
 Q2 (372–436) 0.55 (0.44, 0.66) 0.51 (0.40, 0.63) 0.41 (0.30, 0.52)
 Q3 (437–534) 0.61 (0.49, 0.71) 0.56 (0.45, 0.67) 0.49 (0.37, 0.60)
 Q4 (>534) 0.64 (0.52, 0.75) 0.60 (0.48, 0.71) 0.49 (0.37, 0.61)
P trend 0.35 0.10 0.08

All analyses were run using generalized linear mixed models with random intercepts, binomial distribution, and logit link function.

*

Indicates a p-value < 0.05 comparing that quartile vs. first quartile.

Data are predicted marginal means adjusted for total calorie intake, age, BMI, race, smoking status, infertility diagnosis, and protocol type, unless otherwise specified.