Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 24;34(39):12963–12972. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0336-14.2014

Table 1.

Stimuli list with values for linguistic variablesa

Trial, stimuli Concreteness Imagability Frequency
Overt
    Aunt 564 567 22
    Band 590 579 53
    Branch 583 548 33
    Bush 585 549 14
    Camp 571 588 75
    Cheek 565 561 20
    Earth 580 580 15
    Frog 619 617 1
    Glove 607 596 9
    Heart 605 617 173
    Lamb 633 614 7
    Lamp 615 575 18
    Lunch 552 602 33
    Nurse 588 617 17
    Page 571 555 66
    Plug 558 583 23
    Pool 573 577 111
    Road 583 609 197
    Rope 608 596 15
    Sauce 576 569 20
    Shed 611 602 11
    Straw 603 568 15
    Thumb 638 599 10
    Tool 570 538 40
    Worm 611 578 4
Covert
    Blade 584 568 13
    Bowl 575 579 23
    Cake 624 624 13
    Deer 631 624 13
    Doll 588 565 10
    Flame 582 598 17
    Fork 592 598 14
    Fruit 612 587 35
    Grape 611 591 3
    Hill 588 607 72
    Knee 593 597 35
    Mouse 624 615 10
    Pond 623 599 25
    Sheet 608 594 45
    Shirt 616 612 27
    Shop 549 561 63
    Snake 621 627 44
    Sock 581 553 4
    Song 514 578 70
    Steak 646 647 10
    Stew 603 587 5
    Stove 591 592 15
    Tent 608 593 20
    Wood 606 577 55
    Wool 608 586 10

aThere were no significant differences (p > 0.2) between the mean values of the two word lists (Overt and Covert) for Concreteness, Imagability, or Frequency. Mean values (with SD) were as follows: Overt Concreteness, 590.36 (23.37); Covert Concreteness, 599.12 (27.37); Overt Imagability, 583.36 (23.22); Covert Imagability, 594.36 (22.29); Overt Frequency, 40.08 (50.05); and Covert Frequency 26.04 (20.90).