Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 23;349:g5740. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5740

Table 3.

 Effect of treatment arms on endline standardized mathematics score, controlling for baseline score

Intervention groups No Mean (SD) score Unadjusted change in score (95% CI) Adjusted* difference (95% CI) in endline score v control group
Baseline Endline
Total 3177 0.22 (0.99) 0.34 (0.99) 0.13 (0.08 to 0.17)
Control 1036 0.23 (1.01) 0.29 (1.00) 0.07 (−0.0002 to 0.14) (reference)
Voucher 988 0.14 (0.98) 0.29 (0.98) 0.15 (0.08 to 0.21) 0.04 (−0.05 to 0.14)
Free glasses 1153 0.28 (0.98) 0.43 (0.97) 0.16 (0.07 to 0.24) 0.11 (0.01 to 0.21)
No education 1529 0.15 (1.00) 0.31 (1.01) 0.16 (0.10 to 0.22) (reference)
Education 1648 0.27 (0.97) 0.37 (0.96) 0.10 (0.04 to 0.16) −0.01 (−0.09 to 0.07)
Control: no education 510 0.21 (1.04) 0.27 (1.05) 0.06 (−0.04 to 0.16) (reference)
Control: education 526 0.24 (0.98) 0.32 (0.95) 0.08 (−0.02 to 0.17) 0.03 (−0.12 to 0.17)
Voucher: no education 492 0.08 (0.97) 0.29 (0.97) 0.21 (0.12 to 0.30) 0.10 (−0.03 to 0.23)
Voucher: education 496 0.19 (0.98) 0.28 (1.00) 0.09 (−0.01 to 0.19) 0.02 (−0.12 to 0.16)
Free glasses: no education 527 0.17 (0.99) 0.37 (1.00) 0.19 (0.07 to 0.32) 0.12 (−0.03 to 0.27)
Free glasses: education 626 0.37 (0.95) 0.49 (0.94) 0.12 (0.01 to 0.24) 0.13 (−0.01 to 0.27)

Linear regression using endline math score as dependent variable.

*Adjusted for baseline score.