Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 23;4(9):e005284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005284

Table 1.

Summary characteristics of accreditation and infection control scores, breakdown by peer group and timing of surveys

Hospital peer group
Principal Large Medium Small
N=28 (%) N=13 (%) N=24 (%) N=31 (%)
Full accreditation on both surveys 57.1 61.5 33.3 3.2
Full accreditation in cycle 0 (surveys in 2009 and 2011) 58.8 62.5 21.4 0.0
Full accreditation in cycle 1 (surveys in 2010 and 2012) 54.5 60.0 50.0 10.0
High IC scores in one survey 25.0 30.8 8.3 3.2
High IC scores in both surveys 10.7 15.4 8.3 3.2
High IC scores in cycle 0 (surveys in 2009 and 2011) 29.4 25.0 7.1 0.0
High IC scores in second survey of each cycle (2011 or 2012) 45.5 80.0 30.0 20.0

Peer group as defined by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.30

IC, infection control.