Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 23;4(9):e005284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005284

Table 2.

Multilevel model to show effect of accreditation outcomes on hand hygiene audit rates

Variables Main model (audits 1–8)
Restricted model (audits 3–8)
Mean values Standard error p Values Mean values Standard error p Values
Full accreditation in both surveys 0.004 0.016 0.809 0.0077 0.016 0.620
High infection control scores in one survey −0.042 0.020 0.033 −0.029 0.020 0.135
High infection control scores in two surveys 0.021 0.025 0.404 0.033 0.024 0.172
Later cycle (surveys in 2010/2012) 0.024 0.014 0.073 0.0205 0.013 0.123
Hospital peer group* (principal referral=0)
 Large 0.024 0.020 0.247 0.0233 0.023 0.244
 Medium 0.035 0.017 0.046 0.0343 0.034 0.045
 Small 0.078 0.018 <0.001 0.0807 0.081 <0.001
Number of observations 661 563
Number of hospitals 96 96
Average compliance rates 0.741 0.744
Log likelihood 662 634

Bold typeface indicates significance at p<0.05.

*Peer group as defined by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.30