Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 9;23(10):867–876. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002818

Table 2 .

Associations between treatment plan implementation and patient and team characteristics; unadjusted and adjusted results from logistic regression models allowing for clustering by team*

  Unadjusted (n=2512)† Adjusted Model 1 (n=2431) Adjusted Model 2 (n=2512) Adjusted Model 3 (n=2431)
OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
Age (at first decision) (1 year increase) 1.00 (0.99 to 1.01) 0.60 1.00 (0.99 to 1.01) 0.84
Gender
 Male 1 1
 Female 0.99 (0.80 to 1.21) 0.89 1.01 (0.82 to 1.24) 0.96
IMD quintile
 Least deprived 1 1 1
 2 0.83 (0.53 to 1.30) 0.83 (0.53 to 1.30) 0.80 (0.52 to 1.25)
 3 0.91 (0.58 to 1.40) 0.91 (0.58 to 1.40) 0.87 (0.56 to 1.34)
 4 0.64 (0.43 to 0.98) 0.65 (0.43 to 0.99) 0.64 (0.42 to 0.97)
 Most deprived 0.60 (0.39 to 0.93) 0.04 0.60 (0.39 to 0.93) 0.04 0.60 (0.39 to 0.91) 0.05
 TCI (1 unit increase) 1.68 (0.70 to 4.03) 0.25 2.28 (1.30 to 4.00) 0.004 1.96 (1.15 to 3.31) 0.01
Type of disease team
 Haematological cancer 1 1 1
 Community mental health 0.56 (0.35 to 0.90) 0.60 (0.37 to 0.99) 0.57 (0.39 to 0.82)
 Dementia 1.21 (0.67 to 2.20) 1.11 (0.74 to 1.67) 1.05 (0.76 to 1.45)
 Heart failure 0.93 (0.52 to 1.54) 0.03 0.78 (0.49 to 1.21) <0.001 0.75 (0.50 to 1.14) <0.001
 Skin cancer 0.81 (0.42 to 1.56) 0.97 (0.67 to 1.39) 0.97 (0.67 to 1.39)
 Gynaecological cancer 1.22 (0.62 to 2.38) 2.76 (1.58 to 4.83) 2.48 (1.48 to 4.15)
Adjusted Teachman's (ATI) (1 unit increase) 0.64 (0.35 to 1.17) 0.15 0.65 (0.24 to 1.76)‡ 0.40
Number of professional groups 0.90 (0.77 to 1.06) 0.21 0.84 (0.65 to 1.10)‡ 0.21 0.75 (0.66 to 0.87) <0.001
Patient preferences considered
 No 1 0.24 1 0.34
 Yes 0.86 (0.67 to 1.11) 0.89 (0.69 to 1.14)
Health behaviours/other clinical factors mentioned
 No 1 0.80 1 0.55
 Yes 1.03 (0.83 to 1.27) 1.07 (0.86 to 1.32)

*Intra cluster correlation coefficient for team clustering=0.05 (bootstrap 95% CI 0.01 to 0.08).

†For age n=2504 and for IMD quintile n=2431.

‡ATI and number of professional groups are highly correlated (correlation coefficient 0.8). When included individually in model 2, each showed a significant relationship: OR for ATI=0.38 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.63) p<0.001, OR for number of professional groups=0.76 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.87) p<0.001.

IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation; TCI, Team Climate Inventory.