Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 21;225(4):403–418. doi: 10.1111/joa.12220

Table 7.

Species differences in limb bone mineral density

Test* Statistic P-value Adj. P-value
Humeral mineral density
 Overall χ2[2] = 21.7 < 0.001
O – S U[50,25] = 583 0.641 0.641
O – L U[34,25] = 1005 < 0.001 < 0.001
S – L U[25,25] = 515 < 0.001 < 0.001
Radial mineral density
 Overall χ2[2] = 15.5 < 0.001
O – S U[44,24] = 606 0.320 0.320
O – L U[44,21] = 734 < 0.001 < 0.001
S – L U[24,21] = 375 0.005 0.008
Femoral mineral density
 Overall χ2[2] = 17.7 < 0.001
O – S U[49,24] = 219 < 0.001 0.001
O – L U[49,23] = 449 0.049 0.073
S – L U[24,23] = 354 0.264 0.264
Tibial mineral density**
 Overall χ2[2] = 2.6 0.275
O – S
O – L
S – L
*

Because we had no a priori expectation for how limb bone mineral density should vary with levels of cursoriality, all post hoc tests are two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-tests of the null hypothesis there bone mineral densities are equal among species. Table formatting and abbreviations follow Table 4.

**

Because the overall Krukal–Wallis test comparing tibial bone mineral density among species was not significant, post hoc comparisons were not carried out.