Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Immun. 2014 Jul 10;15(6):424–429. doi: 10.1038/gene.2014.42

Table 2.

Distribution of the major histocompatibility complex haplotype at risk for HIV-related Kaposi’s sarcoma in a case and control study of HIV-positive men

haplotype frequency, SE, 95% CL conditional logistic regression

controls cases OR* (95% CI) p



SNP-221-224-225-227
A-A-G-A 0.016 0.005 0.007–0.026 0.018 0.005 0.008–0.028 - ns
A-G-A-G 0.738 0.016 0.705–0.771 0.685 0.018 0.650–0.719 - ns
G-A-A-A 0.034 0.007 0.021–0.048 0.049 0.008 0.033–0.065 - ns
G-A-A-G 0.049 0.008 0.033–0.065 0.065 0.009 0.047–0.084 - ns
G-A-G-A 0.085 0.011 0.064–0.106 0.105 0.012 0.082–0.128 1.52 (1.01–2.28) 0.047
G-G-A-G 0.064 0.009 0.046–0.083 0.063 0.009 0.045–0.081 - ns
SNP-349-350-352-353-355-367-372
A-A-A-A-A-A-A 0.237 0.016 0.205–0.268 0.283 0.017 0.250–0.317 1.38 (1.02–1.86) 0.035
A-A-A-A-A-G-A 0.036 0.007 0.022–0.049 0.022 0.007 0.011– 0.033 - ns
A-A-A-C-G-A-A 0.412 0.019 0.375–0.449 0.314 0.018 0.279–0.349 - ns
A-A-A-C-G-G-A 0.135 0.013 0.110–0.160 0.157 0.014 0.130–0.184 - ns
A-A-A-C-G-G-G - - - 0.013 0.004 0.004–0.021 - ns
A-A-G-A-A-A-A 0.021 0.005 0.010–0.032 0.018 0.005 0.008–0.028 - ns
A-G-G-A-A-A-A 0.020 0.005 0.010–0.031 0.019 0.005 0.009–0.029 - ns
A-G-G-A-A-G-A 0.010 0.003 0.003–0.017 0.013 0.004 0.004–0.021 - ns
G-G-G-A-A-G-A - - - 0.019 0.005 0.009–0.029 - ns
G-G-G-A-A-A-A 0.073 0.009 0.053–0.092 0.073 0.010 0.053–0.092 - ns
G-G-G-A-A-G-G - - - 0.026 0.006 0.014–0.039 10.5 (2.54–43.6) 0.0012
G-G-G-C-A-A-A 0.018 0.005 0.008–0.028 0.020 0.005 0.009–0.030 - ns

Odds ratios (OR) and lower and upper 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by conditional logistic regression in haplotype trend regression models (HTR) adjusted for baseline age and for time-dependent CD4+ T-cell covariates. (ns)- not significant at the 5% threshold level to enter or to stay in the stepwise selection logistic models.

(*)

-Test of the distal haplotype was further adjusted for the effects of HLA -B. Note that the frequencies do not add to 100% because only haplotypes with frequencies greater than 1% were modeled; the remaining haplotypes were grouped together and included in the HTR models as a single term. (−) -not observed at the frequency cutoff of 1%.