Table III.
Characteristic | n | Median* | p* |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Male | 42 | 200 | 0.983 |
Female | 56 | 200 | |
Prep type | |||
NuLytely (0) | 88 | 200 | 0.467 |
Fleets (1) | 10 | 237.5 | |
First colonoscopy | |||
Yes | 58 | 200 | 0.447 |
No | 36 | 225 | |
Reason | |||
Screening colonoscopy | 95 | 200 | 0.759 |
Polyp surveillance | 2 | 300 | |
Family history (1st degree relative) | |||
Yes | 11 | 200 | 0.631 |
No | 82 | 200 | |
Feel completely back to normal 1 wk after colonoscopy | |||
Yes | 93 | 200 | 0.385 |
No | 4 | 275 | |
Missed paid work | |||
Yes | 42 | 225 | 0.454 |
No | 54 | 150 | |
Missed household chores | |||
Yes | 46 | 250 | 0.032 |
No | 50 | 175 | |
Missed caring for others | |||
Yes | 28 | 175 | 0.262 |
No | 68 | 200 | |
Missed leisure activities | |||
Yes | 45 | 250 | 0.049 |
No | 51 | 150 | |
Missed other activities | |||
Yes | 14 | 237.5 | 0.364 |
No | 83 | 200 | |
“Bad effects” from colonoscopy: | |||
Yes | 16 | 250 | 0.103 |
No | 79 | 200 | |
History of cancer, any type | 30 | 200 | 0.957 |
No history of cancer | 68 | 200 | |
Colonoscopy experience | |||
Moderately or very easy | 55 | 150 | 0.007 |
Neither easy nor difficult | 17 | 200 | |
Moderately or very difficult | 22 | 250 | |
Work days missed | |||
Zero | 16 | 100 | 0.214 |
Part of a day | 8 | 250 | |
One | 22 | 250 | |
Two | 8 | 212.5 | |
Three or more | 1 | 20 | |
Not applicable | 40 | 200 | |
Preparation for colonoscopy (3 cat) | |||
Moderately or very easy | 31 | 100 | <0.001 |
Neither easy nor difficult | 19 | 100 | |
Moderately or very difficult | 46 | 250 | |
Mode of transportation | |||
Personal/family car | 78 | 200 | 0.065 |
Friend’s car | 16 | 100 | |
Taxi | 0 | ||
Bus | 0 | ||
Other | 4 | 275 | |
Who accompanied patient | |||
Spouse or significant other | 62 | 200 | 0.151 |
Relative | 13 | 250 | |
Friend | 19 | 150 | |
Other | 4 | 75 | |
Roundtrip distance | |||
Less than 5 miles | 13 | 300 | 0.436 |
5 to 9.9 miles | 20 | 225 | |
10 to 19.9 miles | 27 | 200 | |
20 to 29.9 miles | 15 | 100 | |
30 to 49.9 miles | 11 | 250 | |
50 or more miles | 12 | 237.5 | |
Recovery from colonoscopy | |||
Very easy | 56 | 212.5 | 0.619 |
Moderately easy | 26 | 175 | |
Neither easy nor difficult | 5 | 150 | |
Moderately difficult | 6 | 100 | |
Very difficult | 1 | 150 | |
Risk of colon cancer compared to others your age (self reported) | |||
Lower | 37 | 100 | 0.090 |
Average | 51 | 200 | |
Higher | 10 | 275 | |
How effective do you think colonoscopy is…? | |||
Completely ineffective | |||
Not very effective | 2 | 150 | 0.375 |
Moderately effective | 0 | ||
Very effective | 24 | 150 | |
72 | 212.5 | ||
General Health | |||
Excellent | 27 | 250 | 0.072 |
Very good | 44 | 200 | |
Good | 19 | 150 | |
Fair | 6 | 99.5 | |
Poor | 2 | 137.69 | |
Race | |||
White | 86 | 225 | 0.011 |
Black/African American | 9 | 100 | |
Hispanic | 1 | 75 | |
Asian/Pacific Islander | 1 | 100 | |
Other | 0 | ||
Education | |||
7th grade or lower | 0 | 0.033 | |
8th through 11th grade | 1 | 200 | |
High school graduate or GED | 6 | 50 | |
Some college or vocational sch. | 13 | 150 | |
2-year college | 6 | 100 | |
4-year college | 22 | 237.5 | |
Professional or graduate degree | 50 | 225 | |
Insured | 90 | 200 | 0.050 |
Not insured | 7 | 100 | |
Medicare | |||
Yes | 39 | 150 | 0.089 |
No | 58 | 225 | |
Medicaid | |||
Yes | 2 | 175 | 0.321 |
No | 94 | 200 | |
Number of people in household: | |||
One | 17 | 150 | 0.107 |
Two | 59 | 200 | |
Three | 14 | 200 | |
Four | 5 | 225 | |
Five | 3 | 500 | |
Six | 0 | ||
Seven or more | 0 | ||
Annual Household Income | |||
0 to $14,999 | 9 | 100 | 0.005 |
$15,000 to $29,999 | 6 | 125 | |
$30,000 to $44,999 | 8 | 100 | |
$45,000 to $59,999 | 12 | 100 | |
$60,000 to $74,999 | 10 | 150 | |
$75,000 to $89,999 | 10 | 212.5 | |
$90,000 or greater | 33 | 250 | |
Did not wish to answer | 10 | 325 | |
Current employment status: | |||
Employed | 46 | 250 | 0.095 |
Unemployed | 1 | 500 | |
Housewife/husband | 4 | 250 | |
Retired | 40 | 150 | |
Disabled | 7 | 100 |
Medians and p values calculated using wilcoxon rank-sum for variables with two categories and using Kruskal-Wallis for variables with more than two categories.