Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 25;8:181. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00181

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A–D) On the radar charts are illustrated, for the N/KTT and KTT cases of Cl and Cl2 conditions, the percentages of positive and negative wγ(1) values ranked per within-ranges of durations. Note that the areas generated by the eight within-range percentages of positive wγ(1) values are wider in the KTT than in N/KTT cases for both Cl and Cl2 conditions. (E,F) The percentages of N/KTT vs. KTT positive wγ(1) values are compared for the Cl and the Cl2 conditions, respectively. The red area indicates for each of the eight within-ranges of durations the differential percent of positive wγ(1) values. This area is wider in the KTT than in the N/KTT case, both for the Cl and the Cl2 conditions. Compound shapes are obtained by combination of areas of positive wγ(1) values in the N/KTT and KTT cases for both the Cl and Cl2 conditions. The overlapping area was excluded, turning the filled region into a hole. (G) The increase of positive wγ(1) values in the KTT case is comprehensively indicated as differential percent equivalent both for the Cl and Cl2 conditions (see text for more explanations). %pos (red) = percentages of positive wγ(1) values. %neg (black) = percentages of negative wγ(1) values. δ%pos (red) = differential percent equivalent for percentages of positive wγ(1) values. δ%neg (black) = differential percent equivalent for percentages of negative wγ(1) values.