Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 29;1(Pt 5):361–379. doi: 10.1107/S2052252514014845

Table 1. Comparison of results for NH3 from a multipole refinement with constrained hydrogen parameters, an X-ray constrained wavefunction (XCW) fitting on the fixed final geometry from the multipole refinement, and an iterative Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR) without any constraints: χ2 agreement statistics, N—H bond length (Å), fractional coordinates and ADPs (Å2).

  Multipoles XCW HAR
χ2 0.8 Inline graphic 0.6
r(N—H) 1.010 1.010 0.987 (5)
N x 0.2103 (1) 0.2103 0.21059 (5)
H x 0.3722 0.3722 0.3668 (9)
H y 0.2627 0.2627 0.269 (1)
H z 0.1113 0.1113 0.1148 (8)
N U 11 0.0372 (2) 0.0372 0.0363 (2)
N U 12 −0.0009 (1) −0.0009 −0.00163 (9)
H U 11 0.0053 0.0053 0.070 (3)
H U 22     0.066 (3)
H U 33     0.064 (3)
H U 12     −0.016 (3)
H U 13     0.006 (2)
H U 23     −0.009 (3)

χ2 values before and after X-ray constrained wavefunction fitting.