Table 2.
Dimensions | Indicators | Questions and items | Operation definition | Mean | Min, max | Percentage | Data source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country-level (N = 29) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social and political attitudes |
|||||||
Liberty aspiration |
If you had to choose, which one would you say is most important? And which would be the next important? |
Respondents’ priorities were “giving people more say in important government decisions” and “protecting freedom of speech”. Assigning 3 points for both items on first and second rank, 2 points for one of these items on first rank, 1 point for one of these items on second rank, and 0 for none of these items on first or second rank. The mean of the aggregate score was computed. |
1.34 |
0.71, 1.92 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
|
1. Maintaining order in the nation | |||||||
2. Giving people more say in important government decisions | |||||||
3. Fighting rising prices | |||||||
4. Protecting freedom of speech | |||||||
Democratic attitude |
Could you please tell me if you agree with the following items at a 4-point scale? |
The index was created by adding up the four items. The higher the value, the more-positive attitude toward democracy. The direction of item 1, 2, and 3 were reversed. Mean of the sum of scores of these four items was computed. |
11.49 |
9.82, 12.71 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
|
1. In democracy, the economic system runs badly | |||||||
2. Democracies are indecisive and have too much quibbling | |||||||
3. Democracies aren’t good at maintaining order | |||||||
4. Democracy may have problems but it’s better than any other form of government | |||||||
Value diversity |
Please tell me whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified or something in between along a 10-point scale. |
The sum of the standard deviation of each statement was calculated |
14.21 |
11.92, 16.69 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
|
1. Homosexuality | |||||||
2. Abortion | |||||||
3. Divorce | |||||||
4. Euthanasia | |||||||
5. Suicide |
|||||||
Social exclusion |
Ethnic tolerance |
Could you please sort out any that you would not like to have as neighbors? |
The percentage of not mentioning immigrants |
79.04 |
6.21, 97.40 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
Immigrant percentage |
|
The percentage of immigrants by total population |
10.37 |
1.30, 39.40 |
--- |
OECD, ADB |
|
Equal opportunities |
Gender employment ratio |
|
Female to male employment ratio |
0.76 |
0.56, 0.94 |
--- |
OECD, ADB |
Gender wage gap |
|
The difference between male and female earnings expressed as a percentage of male earnings |
18.47 |
7.10, 40.40 |
--- |
OECD, ADB |
|
Social expenditure |
|
Percentage of GDP |
19.96 |
5.26, 30.10 |
--- |
OECD, ADB |
|
Health expenditure |
|
Percentage of GDP |
7.48 |
4.89, 13.00 |
--- |
OECD, ADB |
|
Physician density |
|
Number of physicians per 1,000 people |
2.71 |
1.16, 4.23 |
--- |
OECD, ADB |
|
Education expenditure |
|
Percentage of GDP |
5.23 |
2.80, 8.10 |
--- |
WDI, ADB |
|
Government responsibility |
How would you place your views on this scale? |
The percentage of people who placed their view as ≤ 5 was determined |
56.52 |
13.92, 79.25 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
|
The government should take more responsibility to ensure that everyone is provided for versus people should take the responsibility to provide for themselves. | |||||||
The responses exhibited a range from 1–10, with 1 being “government should take more responsibility” and 10 being “people should take more responsibility”. | |||||||
Regional disparity |
Gini index × 100 |
|
Gini coefficients of family income |
31.67 |
22.50, 52.50 |
--- |
WDI, ADB |
Availability of social relations |
Association membership |
|
Percentage of people who had joined at least one among a list of 15 voluntary organizations |
60.04 |
14.37, 95.66 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
Quality of social relations |
Social trust |
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people? |
Percentage of people reporting 1 |
36.73 |
12.30, 66.53 |
|
WVS/EVS |
1. Most people can be trusted | |||||||
2. Need to be very careful | |||||||
Quality of social institutions |
Trust in civil service |
How much confidence you have in the civil service? A great deal, quite a lot, not very much, or none at all |
Percentage of “a great deal” and “quite a lot” |
44.42 |
14.34, 66.58 |
--- |
WVS/EVS |
Individual-level (N = 47,923) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-rated health (good health) |
|
Fair and bad health (reference) vs. good and very good health |
--- |
--- |
68.43 |
WVS, EVS |
|
Gender (men) |
|
Women (reference) vs. men |
--- |
--- |
46.97 |
WVS, EVS |
|
Age |
|
Age in years |
45.96 |
14, 110 |
--- |
WVS, EVS |
|
Educational level |
|
Primary education (reference) |
--- |
--- |
27.71 |
WVS, EVS |
Upper secondary education |
52.06 |
||||||
Tertiary education |
|
|
20.23 |
||||
|
Income |
|
Lower tertile (reference) |
--- |
--- |
26.19 |
WVS, EVS |
Middle tertile |
35.54 |
||||||
Upper tertile | 38.27 |
ADB, Asian Development Bank; EVS, European Value Survey; OECD, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development; WDI, World Development Indicators; WVS, World Value Survey.