Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 28;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-87

Table 2.

Measurements and descriptive statistics for the variables analyzed

Dimensions Indicators Questions and items Operation definition Mean Min, max Percentage Data source
Country-level (N = 29)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Social and political attitudes
             
Liberty aspiration
If you had to choose, which one would you say is most important? And which would be the next important?
Respondents’ priorities were “giving people more say in important government decisions” and “protecting freedom of speech”. Assigning 3 points for both items on first and second rank, 2 points for one of these items on first rank, 1 point for one of these items on second rank, and 0 for none of these items on first or second rank. The mean of the aggregate score was computed.
1.34
0.71, 1.92
---
WVS/EVS
1. Maintaining order in the nation
2. Giving people more say in important government decisions
3. Fighting rising prices
4. Protecting freedom of speech
Democratic attitude
Could you please tell me if you agree with the following items at a 4-point scale?
The index was created by adding up the four items. The higher the value, the more-positive attitude toward democracy. The direction of item 1, 2, and 3 were reversed. Mean of the sum of scores of these four items was computed.
11.49
9.82, 12.71
---
WVS/EVS
1. In democracy, the economic system runs badly
2. Democracies are indecisive and have too much quibbling
3. Democracies aren’t good at maintaining order
4. Democracy may have problems but it’s better than any other form of government
Value diversity
Please tell me whether you think it can always be justified, never be justified or something in between along a 10-point scale.
The sum of the standard deviation of each statement was calculated
14.21
11.92, 16.69
---
WVS/EVS
1. Homosexuality
2. Abortion
3. Divorce
4. Euthanasia
  5. Suicide
Social exclusion
Ethnic tolerance
Could you please sort out any that you would not like to have as neighbors?
The percentage of not mentioning immigrants
79.04
6.21, 97.40
---
WVS/EVS
Immigrant percentage
 
The percentage of immigrants by total population
10.37
1.30, 39.40
---
OECD, ADB
Equal opportunities
Gender employment ratio
 
Female to male employment ratio
0.76
0.56, 0.94
---
OECD, ADB
Gender wage gap
 
The difference between male and female earnings expressed as a percentage of male earnings
18.47
7.10, 40.40
---
OECD, ADB
Social expenditure
 
Percentage of GDP
19.96
5.26, 30.10
---
OECD, ADB
Health expenditure
 
Percentage of GDP
7.48
4.89, 13.00
---
OECD, ADB
Physician density
 
Number of physicians per 1,000 people
2.71
1.16, 4.23
---
OECD, ADB
Education expenditure
 
Percentage of GDP
5.23
2.80, 8.10
---
WDI, ADB
Government responsibility
How would you place your views on this scale?
The percentage of people who placed their view as ≤ 5 was determined
56.52
13.92, 79.25
---
WVS/EVS
The government should take more responsibility to ensure that everyone is provided for versus people should take the responsibility to provide for themselves.
The responses exhibited a range from 1–10, with 1 being “government should take more responsibility” and 10 being “people should take more responsibility”.
Regional disparity
Gini index × 100
 
Gini coefficients of family income
31.67
22.50, 52.50
---
WDI, ADB
Availability of social relations
Association membership
 
Percentage of people who had joined at least one among a list of 15 voluntary organizations
60.04
14.37, 95.66
---
WVS/EVS
Quality of social relations
Social trust
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?
Percentage of people reporting 1
36.73
12.30, 66.53
 
WVS/EVS
1. Most people can be trusted
2. Need to be very careful
Quality of social institutions
Trust in civil service
How much confidence you have in the civil service? A great deal, quite a lot, not very much, or none at all
Percentage of “a great deal” and “quite a lot”
44.42
14.34, 66.58
---
WVS/EVS
Individual-level (N = 47,923)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Self-rated health (good health)
 
Fair and bad health (reference) vs. good and very good health
---
---
68.43
WVS, EVS
 
Gender (men)
 
Women (reference) vs. men
---
---
46.97
WVS, EVS
 
Age
 
Age in years
45.96
14, 110
---
WVS, EVS
 
Educational level
 
Primary education (reference)
---
---
27.71
WVS, EVS
Upper secondary education
52.06
Tertiary education
 
 
20.23
 
Income
 
Lower tertile (reference)
---
---
26.19
WVS, EVS
Middle tertile
35.54
      Upper tertile     38.27  

ADB, Asian Development Bank; EVS, European Value Survey; OECD, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development; WDI, World Development Indicators; WVS, World Value Survey.