Table 4.
R-peak detection results for methods M1-M5
| |
Training dataset |
Test dataset |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Se [%] | + P [%] | μ pd [ms] | σ pd [ms] | Se [%] | + P [%] | μ pd [ms] | σ pd [ms] |
| ICA LC1 |
99.5 |
99.4 |
3.5 |
6.5 |
99.2 |
99.1 |
5.8 |
5.0 |
| M1 |
86.8 |
88.4 |
0.2 |
2.3 |
87.1 |
89.4 |
23.8 |
19.1 |
| M2 |
89.2 |
96.7 |
4.1 |
4.7 |
88.9 |
91.2 |
3.4 |
2.3 |
| M3 |
78.3 |
54.4 |
7.1 |
4.4 |
72.1 |
57.5 |
8.9 |
3.8 |
| M4 |
79.3 |
82.3 |
5.0 |
5.9 |
75.6 |
77.2 |
6.1 |
5.4 |
| M5 | 88.7 | 86.3 | 6.9 | 9.2 | 84.3 | 87.5 | 5.2 | 10.7 |
R-peak detection results for methods M1-M5. Results are given for the training and test dataset. Averaged results of the ICA based method with lead configuration LC1 is shown for comparison (μpd: mean detection delay; σpd: jitter).