Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e107406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107406

Table 1. Parameters of the fits shown in Fig. 6.

pH 8.2 global pH 7.5 global pH 5.5 global pH 5.5 free pH 5.5 free
Color in Fig. 6 red red red black black
f pC 100 100 100 100 100
s* 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
uT mV 25 25 25 25 25
HC M 6.3E–9 3.16E–8 3.16E–6 3.16E–6 3.16E–6
kCB,1* 1/(sM) 7.05E15 7.05E15 7.05E15 7.05E15 4.11E4
kCB,1 HC 1/s 4.46E7 2.23E8 2.23E10 2.23E10 0.13
kBC* 1/s 16092 16092 16092 16092 7.8
kBO,0* 1/s 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028 3.21 1.92
kOB,0* 1/s 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.028 0.27
κOC 1/s 2.7 2.7 2.7 0.34 1.22E5
κCO* 1/s 14500 14500 14500 1.86E7 14500
Erev, fit mV 156 115 0 0 0
Erev, Nernst mV 159 118 0 0 0

The asterisks denote free parameters which were equal for the global fits at cytosolic pH 8.2, 7.5 and 5.5 (italic numbers). The bold numbers indicate values, which are different for different pH values. There are two “free” fits at pH 5.5. Here, only the non-bold, non-italic parameters were equal to those of the global fit for pH 7.5 and 8.2. Bold numbers are different from those of the global fit. “Erev, fit” is obtained from the intersection of the fitted curves with the voltage axis, “Erev, Nernst” is calculated from the pH gradient (pHext = 5.5).