Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 1;198(1):59–73. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.165886

Table 3. Comparison of gene abundance estimates for simulated CAST and DO RNA-seq data after alignment to NCBIM37 reference and individualized transcriptomes.

No. genes with estimates x% from ground truth
Aligned to Mismatches allowed Genes above threshold <5% <10% >10% >50%
CAST reads
 NCBIM37 3 12,186 4,319 8,217 (67) 3,969 (33) 485
 CAST 3 12,108 8,718 10,544 (87) 1,542 (13) 174
 NCBIM37 0 12,137 1,465 2,925 (24) 9,212 (76) 1,576
 CAST 0 12,059 7,023 9,568 (79) 2,491 (21) 152
DO reads
 NCBIM37 3 11,899 7,260 9,805 (82) 2,094 (18) 230
 DO IRG 3 11,863 8,569 10,471 (88) 1,380 (12) 161
 NCBIM37 0 11,879 2,309 4,810 (40) 7,069 (60) 530
 DO IRG 0 11,857 7,110 9,575 (81) 2,262 (19) 164

Alignment of simulated CAST reads to the individualized CAST transcriptome results in twice as many gene estimates (N = +4399) that fall within 5% of ground-truth value and fewer than half as many gene estimates (N = −2427) that deviate >10% from the ground truth. Gene estimates in the simulated DO sample are also improved by read alignment to the individualized transcriptome, yielding 18% more estimates (N = +1309) within 5% of the ground-truth value and 34% fewer estimates (N = −714) that deviate >10% from the ground truth.