Figure 9.

(a) Fat thickness and bone location of the CM were adjusted separately (CMAdjFat, CMAdjBone) and together (CMAdj) to match the average bone-to-muscle distance and fat thickness of AM-R for the anterior and posterior sites. Fat thickness was reduced 2.47 mm, and the bone was shifted upward 11.24 mm. (b) Activation error of the different models. *P < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA between models followed by Bonferroni post hoc test between CM and the other adjusted models, n = 3 per group). AM-(VN)′ is shown as a reference.