Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 17;83(6):1431–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.001

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Orientation-Dependent Synaptic Tuning in CC and CT Neurons

(A) Left: example of four membrane voltage recordings of the synaptic response to gratings moving in the preferred, orthogonal, and antipreferred (null) directions for a CC cell (spikes are clipped). The black bar indicates the stimulus motion, and the shaded area indicates the analysis time window. Right: CC population polar plots show the tuning of the mean PSP integral (top) and peak amplitude (bottom) for all orientations.

(B) Left: example of five membrane voltage recordings of the synaptic response to gratings moving in the preferred, orthogonal, and antipreferred (null) directions for a CT cell (spikes are clipped). The shaded area indicates the analysis time window. Right: CT population polar plots show the tuning of the mean PSP integral (top) and peak amplitude (bottom) for all orientations.

(C) Normalized tuning plot comparing the integral of the PSP depolarization for CC and CT cells for each grating orientation. The shaded line indicates the standard error of the mean of the CC population at the preferred direction.

(D) Orientation selectivity index scores of the integral of the evoked PSP (OSI PSPintegral) for CC and CT cells.

(E) Normalized tuning plot directly comparing the peak amplitude of the PSP depolarization for CC and CT cells for each grating orientation. The shaded line indicates the standard error of the mean of the CC population at the preferred direction.

(F) Orientation selectivity index scores of the evoked PSP peak (OSI PSPpeak) for CC and CT cells.

Error bars show SEM.