Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 5;13:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-13-52

Table 3.

Chart review of patients with 25(OH)D ≥ 100 ng/mL

 
 
 
 
Number of patients
 
25(OH)D level (ng/ml)
Number of patients
Average age ± SD (yrs)
Number of females
Number of pediatric patients a
Suspected cause of elevated 25(OH)D
Hypercalcemia at time of 25(OH)D measurement
              Over-the-counter vitamin D supplements  
UIHCb
> 200
11
43.9 ± 18.3
5 (45.4%)
1 (9.1%)
4 (36.3%)
4 (36.3%)
0
 
151 – 200
16
58.0 ± 19.6
10 (62.5%)
2 (12.5%)
4 (25.0%)
6 (37.5%)
2 (12.5%)
 
126 – 150
24
53.1 ± 17.4
18 (75.0%)
0
6 (25.0%)
6 (25.0%)
1 (4.2%)
 
100 – 125
58
49.5 ± 20.0
38 (65.5%)
2 (3.4%)
6 (10.3%)
4 (6.9%)
0
WCMC
> 200
5
58.8 ± 21.5
4 (80.0%)
0
1 (20%)
3 (60%)
4 (80%)
 
151 – 200
10
46.0 ± 14.9
7 (70.0%)
0
3 (30%)
4 (40%)c
0
 
126 – 150
6
58.8 ± 12.1
6 (100.0%)
1 (16.7%)
1 (16.7%)
0d
0
  100 – 125 29 57.0 ± 16.8 25 (86.2%) 0 4 (13.8%) 10 (34.5%) 0

aAge < 18 years old.

bIncluding repeat measurements on patients, there were 16, 22, 27, and 75 total measurements in the > 100 ng/mL, 151–200 ng/mL, 1260–150 ng/mL, and 100–125 ng/mL categories, respectively.

cOne additional patient received monthly 50,000 IU Vitamin D doses, not listed as given by prescription.

dOne additional patient received “Vitamin B12 and D” injections (no doses listed), not listed as given by provider.