Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Jun 29;4(4):339–343. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.6

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis predicting subsequent training (dichotomous) by newly trained instructors (n = 134)*

Dependent Variable: Training or no training conducted
Variables # of participants % conducted subsequent training Estimate Standard Error Wald chi-square Pr > chisq Odds Ratio 95% Wald Confidence Limits
Community Size 15,000–75,000 27 70.4% 0.1121 0.5607 0.0400 0.2833 1.119 0.373 3.357
>75,000 55 50.9% −0.5904 0.4527 1.7007 0.554 0.228 1.346
<15,000 52 63.5% - - - - - -
Work setting healthcare setting (e.g., physician office) 16 37.5% −0.7858 0.6888 1.3017 0.0694 0.456 0.118 1.758
agency/clinic operated by the government 89 65.17% 0.5292 0.4969 1.1342 1.698 0.641 4.496
community mental health setting/private practice 29 55.2% - - - - - -
Prior DMH Experience 1 26 57.7% −0.0187 0.4971 0.0041 0.5875 0.981 0.370 2.600
2+ 26 76.9% 0.5470 0.5494 0.9911 1.728 0.589 5.073
None 80 56.3% - - - - - -
Perception of Transfer of Training (PTT] 0.0722 0.0337 4.5849 0.0323* 1.075 1.006 1.148

1Variables with p value from the bivariate model < .20 were included in the multivariable model

*

p < .05