Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Personal Disord. 2014 Jul;5(3):257–267. doi: 10.1037/per0000072

Table 3. Regression Results for Psychopathy Factors × Gender × Partner IPV Interactions.

b 95% CI OR/IRR χ2 p
Zero-Inflation Model
BPD-SX -.22 -.43, -.02 0.80 3.93 .047
SUD-SX .01 -.05, .04 1.00 0.08 .782
Gender -.40 -2.32, 1.52 0.66 0.17 .683
F1 .33 -.02, .70 1.40 3.25 .071
F2 -.06 -.47, .34 0.93 0.10 .757
Partner IPV -.13 -.24, -.02 0.87 5.99 .014
F1 × F2 -.03 -.11, .04 0.96 0.74 .388
Gender × F1 -.30 -.93, .31 0.73 0.93 .335
Gender × F2 .37 -.22, .98 1.45 1.48 .223
Gender × Partner IPV -.11 -.22, .05 0.89 1.67 .196
F1 × Partner IPV .01 -.01, .05 1.01 0.99 .318
F2 × Partner IPV .01 -.02, .04 1.01 0.35 .555
Gender × F1 × Partner IPV -.01 -.07, .04 0.98 0.30 .583
Gender × F2 × Partner IPV .01 -.04, .07 1.01 0.25 .619
Gender × F1 × F2 -.01 -.10, .08 0.99 0.02 .883
Poisson Model
BPD-SX .21 .18, .23 1.23 326.05 < .001
SUD-SX -.06 -.07, -.05 0.93 206.52 <.001
Gender -.50 -.64, -.36 0.60 48.16 <.001
F1 .14 .11, .17 1.15 80.88 <.001
F2 -.01 -.03, .02 0.99 0.11 .742
Partner IPV .01 .01, .01 1.01 627.46 <.001
F1 × F2 -.02 -.03, -.01 0.97 20.61 <.001
Gender × F1 .03 -.02, .09 1.03 1.42 .234
Gender × F2 -.03 -.08, .01 0.96 2.09 .148
Gender × Partner IPV .01 .010, .019 1.01 44.09 <.001
F1 × Partner IPV -.003 -.004, -.003 0.996 240.99 <.001
F2 × Partner IPV -.0001 -.000, .000 0.999 0.13 .716
Gender × F1 × Partner IPV .003 .001, .005 1.003 8.62 .003
Gender × F2 × Partner IPV .002 .001, .004 1.002 10.23 .001
Gender × F1 × F2 -.000 -.018, .017 1.000 0.00 .957

Note. OR = Odds Ratio; IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio; BPD-SX = Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms; SUD-SX = Substance Use Disorder Symptoms; F1 = Factor 1; F2 = Factor 2; IPV= Intimate Partner Violence; The Zero-Inflation Model predicts P (IPV = 0); The Poisson Model predicts IPV, where IPV > 0.