Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2
Trial name or title Randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery: a multi-centre pilot study
Methods Randomised controlled trial. Random allocation to: [A] Restrictive use of episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery. [B] Routine use of episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery
Participants The study aims to recruit 200 women. Inclusion criteria: primigravid women in the third trimester of pregnancy (>36 weeks) with a singleton cephalic pregnancy who are English speakers and have no contra-indication to vaginal birth. Exclusion criteria: Women who are: non-English speakers; who have contra-indication to vaginal birth; multiple pregnancy; malpresentation; multiparous women as the rate ofinstrumental delivery is significantly lower in these women making the effort of recruitment unjustified; women who have not given written informed consent prior to the onset of labour
Interventions Random allocation to: [A] Restrictive use of episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery. [B] Routine use of episiotomy for instrumental vaginal delivery
Outcomes Damage to the anal sphincter (third or fourth degree tears).
Starting date 01/09/2005
Contact information Miss B Strachan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
St Michael’s Hospital
Bristol
BS2 8EG
Telephone: 0117 928 5594
Fax: 0117 928 5180
E-mail: bryony.strachan@ubht.swest.nhs.uk
Notes