Methods | Generation method of randomization not established. Concealment allocation method not established. ’Allocated randomly’. |
|
Participants | 181 women primigravid, vaginal delivery, at least 16 years old, no less than 38 weeks’ gestational age, not suffering from any important medical or psychiatric conditions or eclampsia | |
Interventions | One group were not to undergo episiotomy unless it was considered to be medically essential by the person in charge, that is the accoucheur could see that a woman was going to sustain a greater damage or if the intact perineum was thought to be hindering the achievement of a safe normal or operative delivery Another group were to undergo mediolateral episiotomy. |
|
Outcomes | Severe maternal trauma. Any posterior perineal trauma. Need for suturing perineal trauma | |
Notes | Mediolateral episiotomies. Epsiotomy rates were 7.6% for restricted group and 100% for the routine group | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | B - Unclear |