Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2
Methods Generation method of randomization not established.
Concealment allocation method not established.
’Allocated randomly’.
Participants 181 women primigravid, vaginal delivery, at least 16 years old, no less than 38 weeks’ gestational age, not suffering from any important medical or psychiatric conditions or eclampsia
Interventions One group were not to undergo episiotomy unless it was considered to be medically essential by the person in charge, that is the accoucheur could see that a woman was going to sustain a greater damage or if the intact perineum was thought to be hindering the achievement of a safe normal or operative delivery
Another group were to undergo mediolateral episiotomy.
Outcomes Severe maternal trauma. Any posterior perineal trauma. Need for suturing perineal trauma
Notes Mediolateral episiotomies. Epsiotomy rates were 7.6% for restricted group and 100% for the routine group
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B - Unclear