TABLE 2.
Troubleshooting table.
| Step | Problem | Possible reason | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Error report: ‘The sequences submitted for the input dataset appear to be in a format that MEME-ChIP does not recognize. Please check to be sure that your data is formatted properly.’ |
Make sure that you did not submit a Word document or a BED file or other invalid file format |
Re-format your sequence file to ensure that it is in FASTA sequence format |
| Confirmation email is not received | You might have entered your email address incorrectly or your email program may be filtering the MEME-ChIP email as spam |
Check your folders designated as junk e-mail or spam. Try to configure your mail program not to filter out emails from http://meme.nbcr.net or http://meme.ebi.edu.au |
|
| 24 | The job stopped with a time-out error | Very large MEME-ChIP jobs may run out of time on the web server |
Resubmit the job on an alternative server. Currently the hardware on the server at http://meme.ebi.edu.au is twice as fast as that at http://meme.nbcr.net Alternatively, run the job on your own computer after installing MEME Suite (Box 4) |
| 24 | In the ‘PROGRAMS’ section of the results page, getsize and MEME finished with warnings like: ‘Duplicate sequence name. XX’. In this case, you may notice that the sequence counts in the ‘INPUT FILES’ section is unusually small |
The sequences in the FASTA file have duplicate FASTA IDs |
Please make sure every sequence has a unique FASTA ID. (The FASTA ID is everything between the ‘>’ and the first white space on the FASTA header line.) The second (or later) duplicate sequence will be ignored by MEME-ChIP during motif discovery |
| In the ‘PROGRAMS’ section of the results page, CentriMo finished with a warning like ‘Skipping sequence XX as its length (XX) does not match the expected length (XX)’ |
The sequences in the FASTA file do not have the same length |
Please make sure every sequence has the same length. Otherwise, CentriMo will skip them |
|
| When analyzing CLIP-seq data, the de novo motifs identified are weakly palindromic, and only half of each palindromic motif matches with a known RBP motif in the database |
The program searched for motifs in both strands of the RNA sequences |
Make sure you check the ‘scan given strand only’ box in Step 8 |
|
| MEME or DREME identified a motif similar to the known canonical motif of the binding factor, but Tomtom annotates it as some other similar or known motif |
The canonical motif might not be included in the selected motif database |
Please make sure that the appropriate motif database is selected in Step 4 Alternatively, make a customized motif data- base that includes the known canonical motif matrix and select that database in Step 4 |
|
| MEME-ChIP finished normally but the known primary known binding motif is not present in the results |
The ChIP-seq or the CLIP-seq experiment failed; the peak calling program or the cross-linking site identification method did not perform as expected |
There are many reasons that a ChIP-seq or CLIP-seq experiment could go wrong. To help identify the problem, check a few positive control (known TF- or RBP-binding) regions. In addition, check to ensure that the correct genome assembly was used to retrieve the sequences |