Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;6(10):a017509. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017509

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) Relation between α, the proportion of “nearby” females and a male’s expenditure on monility and female targeting, M. (B) Relation between the ESS mobility, M*, and the log index of fertilization skew toward nearby females, log (ϕ − 1), at different values for μ, which defines the rate at which α(M) increases to its asymptote.