(1) Significant difference in both groups |
(A) Talking to PARO/Lion |
T = 0 |
T = 0 |
Talking to PARO was more frequent than talking to Lion. |
|
|
N = 15 |
N = 7 |
|
|
|
p < 0.01 |
p < 0.05 |
|
|
(B) Positive changes in expression |
T = 21 |
T = 0 |
Higher observed frequency of positive expressions when interacting with PARO. |
|
|
N = 17 |
N = 8 |
|
|
|
p < 0.01 |
p < 0.01 |
|
|
(C) Laughing with PARO/Lion |
T = 34 |
T = 0 |
Higher observed frequency of laughing when interacting with PARO compared to Lion. |
|
|
N = 16 |
N = 7 |
|
|
|
p = 0.078 |
p < 0.05 |
|
(2) Significant difference in M-group only |
(D) Touching or stroking PARO/Lion |
T = 27.5 |
T = 10 |
Frequency of touching or stroking was higher with Lion than PARO in M-group only. |
|
|
N = 17 |
N = 7 |
|
|
|
p < 0.05 |
p > 0.1 |
|
|
(E) Talking to staff member |
T = 3 |
T = 28 |
Frequency of talking to staff member was higher with Lion than PARO in M-group only. |
|
|
N = 18 |
N = 11 |
|
|
|
p < 0.01 |
p > 0.1 |
|
|
(F) Reaction with negative expression |
T = 13.5 |
T = 7 |
Higher observed frequency of negative expressions when interacting with Lion in M-group only. However, the frequency of negative expressions was low in both conditions in both groups. |
|
|
N = 12 |
N = 5 |
|
|
|
p < 0.05 |
p > 0.1 |
|
|
(G) Talking initiated by staff member |
T = 30.5 |
T = 23.5 |
Higher observed frequency of talking initiated by staff when interacting with Lion in M-group only. |
|
|
N = 19 |
N = 10 |
|
|
|
p < 0.01 |
p > 0.1 |
|
(3) Significant difference in S-group only |
(H) Neutral expression |
T = 57.5 |
T = 8 |
Higher frequency of neutral expression when interacting with Lion in S-group only. |
|
|
N = 19 |
N = 10 |
|
|
|
p > 0.1 |
p < 0.05 |
|