Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 18;13:94. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-94

Table 5.

Studies of human milk (HM) feeding and developmental outcome in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants: meeting criteria for methodological quality

Reference Pinelli et al.  [29] Furman et al.  [30] Tanaka et al.  [31] Horwood et al.  [32] Smith et al.  [33] Johnson et al.  [34] Vohr et al.  [35]
As primary outcome of original study* - + - - - - -
VLBW only + + + + + +† +†
A priori power calculation - - - - - - -
Baseline adjustment for SGA - - - + - - -
Postnatal complication - + - + - + +
Maternal intelligence +/− +/− +/− +/− +/− +/− +/−
Social class or Socioeconomic status + - - +/− +/− + +/−
Child rearing environment +/− +/− - +/− + - +/−
Observers blinded to feeding protocol + + - - - + -
Effect size after adjustment + + NA + + + +
Human milk definition + + + + + + +
Human milk duration + + + + + + +
Human milk fortification + + - - - - -
Human milk feeding data source + - - + + - +
Formula type + + - - - - +

SGA = Small for gestational age, NA = not available.

+Met methodological criterion.

-Did not meet methodological criterion; or not stated or not specified in the publication.

+/−Use surrogates such as income for socioeconomic status, maternal education for maternal intelligence, marital status or one or two parent family for child rearing environment.

*All studies were observational and most were secondary analysis of study cohort from other studies.

†Only children with birth weights <1000 g.

Limited consistency of neurodevelopment outcome. Human milk showed variable advantage in some test scores [3235].