Table 3.
Results of a questionnaire survey after hands-on training.
| Q1. Realism, scope manipulation | Q2. Realism, ES | Q3 Possibility-improving their own ES skill | Q4. Recommend colleagues, ES | Q5. †Realism, NKP | Q6. †Possibility-improving their own NKP skills | Q7. †Recommend colleagues, NKP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All participants | 6 (3–9) | 7 (2–9) | 8 (0–10) | 10 (7–10) | 8 (8–10) | 10 (8–10) | 10 (8–10) |
| ES experience§ | |||||||
| Beginners, <10 cases | 8 (7–9) | 7.5 (6–9) | 10 (9-10) | 10 (10) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Intermediate, 10–100 cases | 5 (3–8) | 7 (4–8) | 8 (5–10) | 10 (7–10) | n.a. | 10 (8–10) | 10 (8–10) |
| Expert, >100 cases | 6 (4–7) | 7 (2–9) | 7 (0–8) | 10 (8–10) | 8 (8–10) | 10 (10) | 10 (10) |
Data presented as median, range.
∗See Table 1 for details of each question.
†Only 6 participants performed NKP procedures.
§Q1 to Q4: there were no significant differences in the scores between beginner versus intermediate and beginner versus expert.
Q6, Q7: there were no significant differences in the scores between beginner versus intermediate and beginner versus expert.