Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 10;2014:908693. doi: 10.1155/2014/908693

Table 3.

Results of a questionnaire survey after hands-on training.

Q1. Realism, scope manipulation Q2. Realism, ES Q3 Possibility-improving their own ES skill Q4. Recommend colleagues, ES Q5. Realism, NKP Q6. Possibility-improving their own NKP skills Q7. Recommend colleagues, NKP
All participants 6 (3–9) 7 (2–9) 8 (0–10) 10 (7–10) 8 (8–10) 10 (8–10) 10 (8–10)
ES experience§
 Beginners, <10 cases 8 (7–9) 7.5 (6–9) 10 (9-10) 10 (10) n.a. n.a. n.a.
 Intermediate, 10–100 cases 5 (3–8) 7 (4–8) 8 (5–10) 10 (7–10) n.a. 10 (8–10) 10 (8–10)
 Expert, >100 cases 6 (4–7) 7 (2–9) 7 (0–8) 10 (8–10) 8 (8–10) 10 (10) 10 (10)

Data presented as median, range.

∗See Table 1 for details of each question.

Only 6 participants performed NKP procedures.

§Q1 to Q4: there were no significant differences in the scores between beginner versus intermediate and beginner versus expert.

Q6, Q7: there were no significant differences in the scores between beginner versus intermediate and beginner versus expert.