Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 10;14:319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-319

Table 3.

Strength of evidence for effect of postpartum lifestyle interventions on weight, adiposity, metabolic and biological markers

Outcome Strength of evidence Intervention Conclusions
Weight Low Nutrition and Exercise Four good quality RCTs had inconsistent findings. Three of the four fair-to-good quality studies reported greater weight loss in the intervention group compared to standard postpartum care, but the RCTs were short (≤9 months) in duration and had limited generalizability to racial and ethnic minority groups.
Low Exercise only Results were inconclusive for comparison of exercise-only interventions with standard postpartum care, with low risk for bias, but moderate imprecision and inconsistency in the dire study findings.
Insufficient Nutrition only Only one RCT for comparison of diet-only with standard postpartum care, with high attrition rates and differential loss to follow-up between treatment groups.
Adiposity Low All interventions Few studies included adiposity and there is inconsistency in adiposity measures across studies. One comparison showed a reduction in skinfold thickness; two comparisons reported a statistically significant reduction in waist-to-hip ratios, but estimate of effect were imprecise due to small sample sizes.
Cardio-metabolic Insufficient All interventions One RCT compared lipid and glucose levels between women receiving a nutrition and exercise intervention and historical controls
Biological markers Insufficient All interventions Only one RCT was included for the outcome of adiponectin. Findings from the intervention group were compared to non-randomized historical controls.