Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jul 16;39(5):647–654. doi: 10.1177/0145721713492569

Table 3.

Adjusted Odds Ratios* for the Influence of Gender on Participation, With and Without Race/Ethnicity by Gender Interaction

Logistic Regression Models for Participation Measures

Intervention Retention2,4 CHW Dr. Visits3,4 Intervention Classes3 CHW Home Visits3




Gender AOR5
[95% CI]
AOR5
[95% CI]
AOR5
[95% CI]
AOR5
[95% CI]
Model 1 without Interaction Term
  Men1 0.38* (0.15, 0.96) 0.57 (0.24, 1.37) 0.84 (0.40, 1.74) 0.65 (0.32, 1.30)

Model 2 with Interaction Term
  African American Men1 0.54 (0.17, 1.78) 0.59 (0.19, 1.84) 2.42 (0.90, 6.49) 0.96 (0.41, 2.26)
  Latino Men1 0.24* (0.06, 0.92) 0.55 (0.17, 1.82) 0.24** (0.09, 0.70) 0.34* (0.11, 0.99)
*

Adjusted odds ratios derived from multiple logistic regression models. Covariates were held at their mean for estimations: Age, Education, Marital Status, Treatment Site, Self-rated Health, PAID, MD Satisfaction, MD Support, One-to-One visits3

*

p<.05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001

1

Reference category=Women, 2 Reference category=African-American women, 3 Reference category=Latina women

2

Binary outcome, logistic regression

3

Ordered categories, cumulative logit regression

4

One-to-One Visits were included in models for Withdrawal & Dr. Visits only

5

Adjusted Odds Ratio