Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 24;45(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13567-014-0090-y

Table 2.

Genetic, time and geographical pairwise distances (with corresponding standard deviation values) calculated for the within-year Philippines O CATHAY FMDV isolates groups and for each of the country based data from the earliest samples collected within the specific group

Data No of samples Genetic distance Time distance Geo distance
Philippines
1994 7 0.010 ± 0.002 0.23 ± 0.05 -
1995 8 0.013 ± 0.006 0.63 ± 0.77 124.72 ± 95.81
1996 9 0.020 ± 0.004 0.10 ± 0.03 235.66 ± 252.21
1997 14 0.016 ± 0.013 0.38 ± 0.38 119.65 ± 117.12
1998 23 0.011 ± 0.009 - 51.62 ± 42.08
1999 5 0.011 ± 0.002 - 146.83 ± 222.79
2000 16 0.054 ± 0.021 0.16 ± 0.13 296.55 ± 130.74
2001 7 0.057 ± 0.008 - 14.22 ± 4.28
2003 8 0.051 ± 0.013 0.19 ± 0.08 344.45 ± 26.98
2004 12 0.010 ± 0.004 0.41 ± 0.23 322.32 ± 38.83
2005 3 0.005 ± 0.005 0.03 ± 0.01 12.48 ± 17.65
Global
China 6 0.148 ± 0.081 31.93 ± 19.15 -
Hong Kong 138 0.157 ± 0.022 32.95 ± 7.24 -
Philippines 112 0.047 ± 0.022 4.59 ± 3.50 -
Taiwan 46 0.015 ± 0.025 1.38 ± 3.01 -
Vietnam 13 0.104 ± 0.016 7.84 ± 1.65 -

Genetic distances were estimated by the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano substitution model plus gamma-distributed rates (HKY85 + Γ4), whereas geographic distance were calculated using the Haversine formula [38]. Genetic distance is expressed in base substitution per site, time distance is defined in years, whilst geographical distance is measured in kilometres.