Table 4. Association between outcomes at follow-up (dependent variables) and the percentage of total daily caloric intake from dinner in multiple logistic regression models.
| Lower tertile | Middle tertile | Higher tertile | |
| OR; 95% CI; p | OR; 95% CI; p | ||
| Incident obesity (%) | |||
| Crude | 1 | 1.84; 1.04–3.25; 0.03 | 2.59; 1.50–4.46; <0.001 |
| Model 11 | 1 | 1.88; 0.97–3.66; 0.06 | 2.75; 1.45–5.20; 0.002 |
| Model 22 | 1 | 1.79; 0.89–3.62; 0.10 | 2.33; 1.17–4.65; 0.02 |
| Incident diabetes (%) | |||
| Crude | 1 | 1.16; 0.42–3.23; 0.78 | 2.29; 0.92–5.69; 0.07 |
| Model 11 | 1 | 1.13; 0.40–3.15; 0.82 | 2.36; 0.94–5.90; 0.07 |
| Model 22 | 1 | 0.97; 0.34–2.78; 0.96 | 2.26; 0.89–5.75; 0.09 |
| Incident IFG (%) | |||
| Crude | 1 | 1.00; 0.98–1.01; 0.76 | 1.00; 0.99–1.02; 0.55 |
| Model 11 | 1 | 1.00; 0.98–1.01; 0.66 | 1.00; 0.99–1.02; 0.64 |
| Model 22 | 1 | 1.00; 0.97–1.01; 0.61 | 0.99; 0.97–1.01; 0.49 |
| Incident metabolic syndrome (%) | |||
| Crude | 1 | 1.34; 0.89–2.02; 0.16 | 1.53; 1.02–2.30, 0.04 |
| Model 11 | 1 | 1.32; 0.88–2.00; 0.18 | 1.54; 1.03–2.32; 0.04 |
| Model 22 | 1 | 1.32; 0.87–2.01; 0.19 | 1.52; 1.01–2.30; 0.04 |
| Incident NAFLD (%) | |||
| Crude | 1 | 0.89; 0.61–1.30; 0.56 | 1.58; 1.12–2.24; 0.01 |
| Model 11 | 1 | 0.86; 0.59–1.25; 0.43 | 1.54; 1.09–2.18; 0.01 |
| Model 22 | 1 | 0.88; 0.60–1.30; 0.53 | 1.56; 1.10–2.22; 0.01 |
1
Model 1: multiple logistic regression model, after adjustment for age, sex, BMI at baseline, METS h/week, living in a rural area.
2
Model 2: multiple logistic regression model, after adjustment for age, sex, BMI at baseline, METS h/week, living in a rural area, intake of total energy and saturated fat, and skipping breakfast.
Impaired fasting glucose (IFG); non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); metabolic equivalent of the activity (MET).