Table 1.
Taxonomic level | Taxon | Kruskal-Wallis χ 2 | df |
Median abundance |
FDR adjusted P value a | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Unaffected | Lesion | |||||
Phylum |
Bacteria;Acidobacteria |
18.68 |
2 |
0.97%* |
0.48%** |
0.18%*** |
6.14E-04 |
Bacteria;Deinococcus-Thermus |
9.14 |
2 |
0.37%* |
0.22%** |
0.14%*** |
2.41E-02 |
|
Bacteria;Otherb |
14.27 |
2 |
2.52%* |
2.20%** |
1.42%*** |
2.79E-03 |
|
Bacteria;Proteobacteria |
7.42 |
2 |
33.32%** |
36.21%* |
30.75%*** |
4.27E-02 |
|
Class |
Acidobacteria;Acidobacteria_Gp4 |
14.08 |
2 |
0.92%* |
0.41%** |
0.12%*** |
4.39E-03 |
Bacteroidetes;Sphingobacteria |
8.53 |
2 |
1.70%* |
1.50%** |
0.74%*** |
3.52E-02 |
|
Deinococcus-Thermus;Deinococci |
9.14 |
2 |
0.37%* |
0.22%** |
0.14%*** |
3.44E-02 |
|
Proteobacteria;Alphaproteobacteria |
7.63 |
2 |
16.44%* |
11.37%** |
7.64%*** |
4.41E-02 |
|
Order |
Acidobacteria_Gp4;Gp4 |
14.08 |
2 |
0.92%* |
0.41%** |
0.12%*** |
5.70E-03 |
Sphingobacteria;Sphingobacteriales |
8.53 |
2 |
1.70%* |
1.50%** |
0.74%*** |
3.05E-02 |
|
Alphaproteobacteria;Rhizobiales |
11.53 |
2 |
13.63%* |
7.94%** |
4.11%*** |
1.36E-02 |
|
Betaproteobacteria;Burkholderiales |
8.80 |
2 |
9.33%** |
11.61%* |
5.95%*** |
3.05E-02 |
|
Gammaproteobacteria;Xanthomonadales |
9.34 |
2 |
1.83%* |
1.23%** |
0.32%*** |
3.05E-02 |
|
Family |
Gp4;Other |
14.08 |
2 |
0.92%* |
0.41%** |
0.12%*** |
9.22E-03 |
Sphingobacteriales;Chitinophagaceae |
10.61 |
2 |
0.93%* |
0.56%** |
0.34%*** |
1.74E-02 |
|
Bacillales;Bacillaceae |
11.75 |
2 |
0.61%* |
0.31%** |
0.09%*** |
1.18E-02 |
|
Rhizobiales;Bradyrhizobiaceae |
12.95 |
2 |
2.21%* |
1.89%** |
0.73%*** |
1.08E-02 |
|
Rhizobiales;Methylobacteriaceae |
12.07 |
2 |
8.43%* |
4.42%** |
2.39%*** |
1.18E-02 |
|
Burkholderiales;Burkholderiaceae |
8.46 |
2 |
4.89%* |
4.68%** |
1.95%*** |
3.82E-02 |
|
Burkholderiales;Comamonadaceae |
7.71 |
2 |
2.05%* |
1.64%** |
0.94%*** |
4.94E-02 |
|
Xanthomonadales;Xanthomonadaceae |
9.61 |
2 |
1.79%* |
1.23%** |
0.31%*** |
2.45E-02 |
|
Genus |
Gp4;Other |
14.08 |
2 |
0.92%* |
0.41%** |
0.12%*** |
2.98E-03 |
Chitinophagaceae;Flavisolibacter |
14.32 |
2 |
0.22%* |
0.05%** |
0.02%*** |
2.98E-03 |
|
Bacillaceae;Geobacillus |
8.03 |
2 |
0.06%* |
0.00%*** |
0.00%*** |
3.83E-02 |
|
Methylobacteriaceae;Methylobacterium |
12.19 |
2 |
8.43%* |
4.42%** |
2.39%*** |
5.48E-03 |
|
Burkholderiaceae;Cupriavidus |
21.50 |
2 |
3.20%** |
3.38%* |
0.73%*** |
1.83E-04 |
|
Comamonadaceae;Schlegelella |
25.21 |
2 |
0.64%* |
0.35%** |
0.05%*** |
5.71E-05 |
|
Xanthomonadaceae;Other |
12.74 |
2 |
1.46%* |
0.39%** |
0.17%*** |
4.85E-03 |
|
Operational taxonomical unit (OTU) |
Methylobacterium;484 |
15.16 |
2 |
5.51%* |
2.65%** |
1.22%*** |
1.66E-03 |
Gp4;3855 |
16.95 |
2 |
0.72%* |
0.06%** |
0.00%*** |
9.04E-04 |
|
Xanthomonadaceae;6162 |
10.04 |
2 |
1.06%* |
0.16%** |
0.02%*** |
1.72E-02 |
|
Cupriavidus;6869 |
20.96 |
2 |
2.38%** |
2.40%* |
0.55%*** |
1.83E-04 |
|
Schlegelella;13613 |
26.57 |
2 |
0.47%* |
0.22%** |
0.00%*** |
2.21E-05 |
|
Methylobacterium;24283 | 9.11 | 2 | 1.02%* | 0.74%** | 0.34%*** | 2.28E-02 |
Coding indicates high (*), intermediate (**), or low (***) abundance values in each row.
aOnly taxa significant at 5% FDR are shown.
bThis taxon represents all sequences that were not assigned to a known phylum. It is significant at all taxonomic levels.