Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 18;2:22. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-2-22

Table 3.

Randomized controlled trials comparing STN and GPi DBS

Author, year Number of patients Follow up Side Similar results Differences in results
Anderson et al., 2005 [115]
20
12 months
Bilateral
-Motor symptoms
-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug dosage with STN.
 
-Cognitive and behavioral complications exclusively with STN.
Okun et al., 2009 [116]
45
7 months
Unilateral
-Motor symptoms.
-Worse verbal fluency with STN.
-Side effects including mood and cognition.
-Greater improvement in QOL with GPi [117].
 
-Higher risk to require controlateral DBS implant in STN group [112].
Follett et al., 2010 [57]
299
24 months
Bilateral
-Motor symptoms.
-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug dosage with STN.
-Side effects profile.
-Worse decline in visuomotor processing with STN
-Depression improved with GPi but worsened with STN.
Weaver et al., 2012 [118]
159
36 months
Bilateral
-Motor symptoms.
-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug with STN.
-Side effects profile.
-Worse cognitive performance with STN
Odekerken et al., 2013 [119] 128 12 months Bilateral -Quality of life.
-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug dosage with STN.
-Cognitive, psychiatric and behavioral side effects
-Greater improvement in the OFF phase motor score with STN
  - Greater improvement in disability with STN

Legend: STN: subthalamic nucleus; GPi: Globus pallidum pars interna; DBS: deep brain stimulation; QOL: quality of life.