Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 16;15(1):303. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-303

Table 3.

Comparison of ECMIS with other prediction methods

Method PR (%) SE (%) SP (%) ACC (%) MCC
ECMIS 68% 66% 87% 80% 0.524
RF 70.8 44.7 92.0 77.6 0.429
MINERVA 65.4 44.7 89.7 76.2 0.390
KFC2 58.1 47.4 85.1 73.6 0.345
HotPoint 49.0 63.2 71.3 68.8 0.324
Robetta 52.0 34.2 86.2 70.4 0.235
KFC 48.0 31.6 85.1 68.8 0.191
FOLDEF 47.6 26.3 87.4 68.8 0.168