Skip to main content
. 2014 Summer;13(3):1065–1071.

Table 3.

Therapeutic response of the patients to treatment methods

Therapeutic effect on Groups Great effect
No (%)
Good effect
No (%)
Average effect
No (%)
Ineffective
No (%)
Problem
No (%)
p-value
Itching Group A 1(3) 13(39.4) 5(15.2) 2(6.1) 12 (36.4) 0.71
Group B 0(0.0) 10 (34.5) 7(24.1) 3(10.3) 9 (31)
Burning Group A 2(6.1) 10(30.3) 5(15.2) 1( 3) 15(45.5) 0.04
Group B 0(0.0) 4(13.8) 6 (20.7) 7 (24.1) 12(41.4)
Pain Group A 8(24.24) 15(48.5) 5(15.2) 2 (6.1) 3 (9.1) 0.49
Group B 4(13.8) 10(34.5) 9(31) 2(6.9) 4(13.8)
Inflammation Group A 14(42.4) 16(48.5) 1 (3) 1 (3) 1(3) 0.001
Group B 4(13.1) 9 (31) 14(48.3) 2(6.9) 0 (0.0)
Wound healing Group A 14(42.4) 12(36.4) 6(18.2) 1(3) 0(0.0) 0.02
Group B 4(13.8) 13 (44.8) 10(34.5) 2( 6.9) 0(0.0)
Wound drying Group A 18(54.5) 11(33.3) 4(12.1) 0 ( 0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.04
Group B 8(27.6) 11(37.9) 6 (20.7) 4(13.8) 0 (0.0)
Infection prophylaxis Group A 16(48.5) 13(39.4) 4 (12.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.05
Group B 8(27.6) 9 (31) 10(34.5) 2( 6.9) 0(0.0)

Group A were treated with a topical solution of palemolin (a 5% S. ebulus fruit extract in ethanol 70%) and hydrocortisone topical ointment three times daily. Group B were treated with ethanol 70% topical solution and hydrocortisone topical ointment thrice a day.