Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2014 Jun 7;121(10):1863–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.023

Table 2.

Results from a Clinical Trial Comparing Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil for Non-Infectious Uveitis

Patient Level Methotrexate
(N=35)
Mycophenolate Mofetil
(N=32)
p-value
Treatment Success N(%) 24 (69) 15 (47) 0.09
Treatment Failure N(%) 11 (31) 17 (53)
 Reason for treatment failure N(%)
  Lack of efficacy*   7 (63) 15 (88)
  Intolerability   3 (27) 2 (12)
  Safety concern   1 (9) 0 (0)
Success by Anatomic Location N(%)
  Anterior & Intermediate/Intermediate 2/3 (67) 5/10 (50) 0.99
  Posterior/Panuveitis 22/32 (69) 10/22 (45) 0.10
Time to corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (days)**
  Median (IQR) 139 (62.5–142) 124 (60–156) 0.44
Medication Compliance N(%)
  Missed at least one dose 13 (32) 17 (44) 0.97

Eye Level Methotrexate
(E=68)
Mycophenolate Mofetil
(E=56)
p-value

Mean change in visual acuity*** 0.68
  logMAR (SD) −0.26 (0.33) −0.19 (0.36)
Macular Edema Resolution N(%) 17/22 (77) 7/13 (54) 0.31
*

Did not meet definition of corticosteroid-sparing controlled inflammation at 5 and 6 month visits

**

Time for those who met the definition of treatment success

***

Best-corrected visual acuity of uveitic eyes only

IQR = interquartile range; SD = standard deviation logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution