Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;88(19):11056–11069. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01333-14

TABLE 4.

Phylogenetic clusters identified in this study

Phylogenetic clustera Closest genomeb Genotype by RIVM algorithmc No. of genomes Frequency (%) in 201 genomes
1 NV_GII_VNM_2009_KC175360 GII.P4.DH06b_GII.4.DH06b 140 69.65 (67.6)d
NV_GII_VNM_2009_KC175395
2 NV_GII_VNM_2009_KC175402 GII.P4.DH06b_GII.4.DH06b 2
3 NV_GII4_TW_2007_JN400615 GII.P4.DH06b_GII.4.DH06b 12
NV_GII4_Ehime_2007_AB541241
4 NV_GII_VNM_2010_KC175383 GII.P4.NO09_GII.4.NO09 20 9.95 (9.5)
5 NV_Pune_2007_EU921389 GII.P21_GII.3 19 9.45 (10.2)
6 NV_Pune_2007_EU921389 GII.Pg_GII.12 2 0.99 (0.6)
NV_GII2_12_Wahroonga_2009_JQ613568
7 NV_GII_Gifu_1999_AB084071 (<50%) GII.P7_GII.6 3 1.49 (2.5)
8 NV_GII_Gifu_1999_AB084071 (<50%) GII.P7_GII.6 3 1.49 (2.5)
a

Phylogenetic classification (see Fig. 2).

b

Based on the number of reads mapped.

c

Based on the RIVM algorithm (47).

d

The values in parentheses are genotype frequency percentages determined by My et al. (31).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure