Table 2.

Comparison of the number of activations m of the TM phase and the number of evaluated points S_{Pe} among the proposed algorithm and the reference ones, ATT (automatic target tracking) [17] and and PATT (predictive automatic target tracking) [18]. O, OTCBVS dataset; A, AMCOM dataset; AI, AIC dataset; RATT, relevance-based ATT.

Dataset			ATT [17]		PATT [18]		RATT		Δ ATT [17]	Δ PATT [18]
Seq.	L	STW	m	S{Pe}	m	S{Pe}	m	S{Pe}	S{Pe}%	S{Pe}%
O 03-l1s1ir-1	154	16 × 30	41	44,649	23	25,047	60	846	1.89%	3.38%
O 03-l1s1ir-2	637	7 × 15	4	4,356	4	4,356	F	F	-	-
O 03-l1s2ir-1	557	10 × 22	27	29,403	16	17,424	69	648	2.20%	3.72%
O 03-l1s2ir-2	339	10 × 20	112	121,968	92	100,188	105	635	0.52%	0.63%
O 03-l1s2ir-3	96	9x 18	11	11,979	4	4,356	45	1,548	12.92%	35.54%
O 03-l1s2ir-4	24	12 × 30	0	0	0	0	8	18	>100%	>100%
O 03-l1s3ir-1	84	11 × 24	31	33,759	29	31,581	37	238	0.70%	0.75%
O 03-l1s3ir-2	787	8x 15	33	35,937	0	0	83	373	1.04%	>100%
O 03-l1s3ir-3	448	10 × 24	4	4,356	40	43,560	6	26	0.60%	0.06%
O 03-l2s4ir-1	270	11 × 30	45	49,005	61	66,429	67	2,080	4.24%	3.13%
O 03-l2s6ir-1	323	15 × 28	8	8,712	124	135,036	200	1,382	15.86%	1.02%
A 14-15-mantruck	281	10 × 10	6	6,534	3	3,267	19	96	1.47%	2.94%
A 16-08-m60	290	13 × 7	60	65,340	18	19,602	32	2,788	4.27%	14.22%
A 16-08-apc	80	14 × 8	3	3,267	3	3,267	5	11	0.34%	0.34%
A 16-18-apc	300	11 × 8	15	16,335	1	1,089	29	161	0.99%	14.78%
A 16-18-m60	103	14 × 8	2	2,178	0	0	1	1	0.05%	>100%
A 17-02-mantruck	221	9x 9	2	2,178	16	17,424	39	1,511	69.38%	8.67%
A 17-02-bradley	185	9x 9	5	5,445	9	9,801	6	132	2.42%	1.35%
A 18-13-m60	227	9x 9	25	27,225	8	8,712	34	550	2.02%	6.31%
A 18-16-m60	162	12 × 12	79	86,031	5	5,445	17	150	0.17%	2.75%
A 19-06-apc	208	10 × 10	6	6,534	7	7,623	41	367	5.62%	4.81%
A 21-17-apc	360	12 × 12	0	0	1	1,089	51	229	>100%	21.03%
AI ir11-1	263	21 × 40	93	180,048	110	212,960	147	8,789	4.88%	4.13%
AI ir11-2	155	25 × 37	101	195,536	109	211,024	103	2,993	1.53%	1.42%