Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 29;5:186. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00186

Table 2.

Effect of contrast-leakage in predicting outcome.

Design Extravasation sign No. contrast-leakage positive (%) Total number participating Time-frame Outcome Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
In-hospital mortality
Becker et al. (36) Retrospective Contrast extravasation 52 (46) 113 All patients Hospital fatality 77 73 63 84
Goldstein et al. (37) Retrospective Contrast extravasation 58 (56) 104 All patients Hospital fatality 73 50 33 85
Wada et al. (16) Retrospective Spot sign 13 (33) 39 All patients Hospital fatality 43 69 23 85
Delgado Almandoz et al. (33) Retrospective Spot sign 133 (23) 573 All patients Hospital fatality 41 85 56 76
Li and Wang et al. (21) Prospective Spot sign 30 (22) 139 Within 6 h Hospital fatality 60 81 20 96
Romero et al. (23) Prospective Spot sign 31 (24) 131 All patients Hospital fatality 68 88 61 91
Rizos et al. (22) Prospective Spot sign 27 (27) 101 Within 6 h Hospital fatality 47 77 26 89
90-days mortality
Li and Wang et al. (21) Prospective Spot sign 30 (22) 139 Within 6 h Case fatality 50 82 27 93
Demchuk et al. (18) Prospective Spot sign 53 (25) 211 Within 6 h Case fatality 43 81 43 80
Rizos et al. (22) Prospective Spot sign 27 (27) 101 Within 6 h Case fatality 29 74 26 77
90-days outcome
Delgado-Almandoz et al. (33) Retrospective Spot sign 133 (23) 573 All patients mRS > 3a 23 89 51 70
Li and Wang et al. (21) Prospective Spot sign 30 (22) 139 Within 6 h mRS > 2 36 94 87 58
Romero et al. (23) Prospective Spot sign 31 (24) 131 Within 24 h mRS > 3a 34 94 90 50
Havsteen and Ovesen et al. (38) Prospective Spot sign 37 (29) 128 Within 4.5 h mRS > 4 60 86 68 81

aBased on the surviving patients at 3 months.