Table 2.
Correlation between eye-movement measures (NF, RS and DT) at each target position and reaction time at each position and two working memory task scores.
| NF | RS | DT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | Middle | Bottom | Top | Middle | Bottom | Top | Middle | Bottom | |
| RT at each position | 0.78** | 0.78** | 0.74** | −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.04 | −0.11 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| NF at each position | — | — | — | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.39* |
| RS at each position | — | — | — | — | — | — | −0.16 | −0.19 | 0.65** |
| RST | −0.18 | −0.20 | −0.23 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.23 | −0.08 | −0.41** | 0.11 |
| SST | 0.05 | −0.13 | −0.21 | 0.01 | −0.13 | −0.04 | −0.25 | −0.41** | 0.00 |
Note. RT = reaction time, NF = number of fixations, RS = regression size, DT = distance to target, RST = reading span task, SST = spatial span task. Significant correlations were not found between RT and RST performance (rs(40) = −0.14, −0.25, and −0.26 for the top, middle, and bottom, respectively) and SST (r(40) = 0.17, −0.01, and −0.15 for the top, middle, and bottom, respectively).
** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.