Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 14;2014:105853. doi: 10.1155/2014/105853

Table 2.

Respondents knowledge of partograph.

Variables UCTH (30)  
N = 132  
Freq. (%)
GHC (20)  
N = 130  
Freq. (%)
PHCs (10)  
N = 28  
Freq. (%)
Total  
N = 290
A chart developed by midwives in developed countries to monitor labor
 Yes 22 (16.7) 5 (3.8) 0 (0) 27 (9.3)
 No 110 (83.3) 125 (96.2) 28 (100) 263 (90.7)
 Total 132 (100) 130 (100) 28 (100) 290 (100)
A complex tool with pictorial overview of labor for use by midwives
 Yes 14 (10.6) 14 (10.8) 1 (3.6) 29 (10.0)
 No 118 (89.4) 116 (89.2) 27 (96.4) 261 (90.0)
 Total 132 (100) 130 (100) 28 (100) 290 (100)
A chart for monitoring labor by doctors
 Yes 24 (18.2) 7 (5.4) 6 (21.4) 37 (12.8)
 No 108 (81.8) 123 (94.6) 22 (78.6) 253 (87.2)
 Total 132 (100) 130 (100) 28 (100) 290 (100)
A simple graphic recording of labor and salient conditions of the mother and fetus against time in hours
 Yes 51 (38.6) 28 (21.5) 7 (25.0) 86 (29.7)
 No 81 (61.4) 102 (78.5) 21 (75.0) 204 (70.3)
 Total 132 (100) 130 (100) 28 (100) 290 (100)