Table 1.

Maximum likelihood estimates and AICc values from the null and species-specific models, and delta AICc differences between the two models. Overall, the null model had lower AICc values, except for ospC C and T, compared to the species-specific model (bolded).

HIS/non- HIS	ospC type	Null model				Species-specific model		|Null AICc–species AICc|
		No. parameters	ψ (low–high) (occurrence)	ε (low–high) (transmission)	AICc	No. parameters	AICc	Δ AICc
HIS	A	2	0.56 (0.45–0.67)	0.55 (0.49–0.61)	463.82	9	479.22	15.40
	B	2	0.39 (0.27–0.53)	0.61 (0.52–0.69)	250.08	6	259.14	9.06
	I	2	0.32 (0.21–0.46)	0.33 (0.24–0.43)	232.21	7	240.21	8.00
	K	2	0.52 (0.40–0.65)	0.38 (0.31–0.44)	396.25	8	399.70	3.45
	N	2	0.34 (0.23–0.47)	0.38 (0.29–0.46)	279.92	8	289.98	10.06
Non-HIS	C	2	0.29 (0.18–0.42)	0.44 (0.34–0.54)	216.16	6	215.27	0.89
	D	2	0.29 (0.19–0.40)	0.46 (0.37–0.55)	256.90	8	269.34	12.44
	E	2	0.32 (0.22–0.44)	0.42 (0.34–0.51)	302.95	9	312.85	9.90
	F	2	0.40 (0.28–0.54)	0.39 (0.31–0.48)	288.73	8	298.77	10.04
	G	2	0.44 (0.33–0.55)	0.54 (0.47–0.61)	387.69	9	396.02	8.33
	H	2	0.15 (0.07–0.25)	0.61 (0.47–0.73)	127.27	7	133.17	5.90
	L	2	0.11 (0.04–0.24)	0.40 (0.20–0.61)	62.29	4	66.11	3.82
	M	2	0.33 (0.23–0.45)	0.44 (0.35–0.52)	281.25	8	283.62	2.37
	O	2	0.29 (0.15–0.48)	0.38 (0.26–0.53)	117.72	4	121.20	3.48
	T	2	0.32 (0.21–0.47)	0.69 (0.59–0.77)	189.20	6	181.56	7.64
	U	2	0.17 (0.09–0.28)	0.67 (0.54–0.78)	135.04	7	138.99	3.95