Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2014 May 29;14(7):1562–1572. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12749

Table 4.

Crude and multivariable generalized linear regression model for dialysis facility–level and ESRD Network–level factors associated with a higher standardized transplant ratio

Dialysis facility or network–level factors Crude model
Multivariable-adjusted model1
Multivariable p-value
Rate ratio of STRs in a dialysis facility over 4 years (95% CI)
Dialysis facility–level factors associated with a higher STR
% Patients who are employed, per 10% increase 1.067 (1.060–1.076) 1.042 (1.034–1.051) <0.0001
% ESA use prior to ESRD, per 10% increase 1.081 (1.071–1.090) 1.039 (1.021–1.057) <0.0001
% Patients on peritoneal dialysis, per 10% increase 1.068 (1.057–1.079) 1.039 (1.022–1.057) <0.0001
Number of staff, per 10 staff change 1.037 (1.015–1.059) 1.031 (1.003–1.060) 0.033
% Patients with AVF, per 10% increase 1.043 (1.033–1.054) 1.025 (1.012–1.037) <0.0001
ESRD Network–level factors associated with a higher STR
Transplant centers per 10 000 ESRD patients 1.074 (1.061–1.087) 1.053 (1.019–1.091) 0.0023

AVF, arteriovenous fistula; CI, confidence interval; ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; STR, standardized transplant ratio.

1

Multivariable model was adjusted for all covariates shown in Table 4 as well as organ procurement organization region from which the dialysis facility resided. Markov Chain Monte Carlo multiple imputation used for missing covariate data (<2% of data).