Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;34(40):13384–13398. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2277-14.2014

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Multiplicative response gain increases with focused attention in ERP CRFs. A, C, D, F, The mean amplitudes of P1 (A) and LPD (D) components are plotted as a function of stimulus contrast (see corresponding topographical maps in C and F, respectively). The CRFs for focused-attention targets (blue), focused-attention nontargets (red), divided-attention targets (green), and divided-attention nontargets (purple) were fit with a Naka-Rushton equation (Eq. 2). B, E, A bootstrapping analysis showed that the attentional enhancement on the P1 and LPD components was selectively driven by changes in the response amplitude parameter (Rmax; B, E, middle), and the baseline (b, left) and the semisaturation contrast parameters (C50, right) did not significantly change. Error bars in A and D indicate ±SEM across subjects. Error bars in B and E represent 68% confidence intervals from the bootstrapping analysis. *, **, and *** Indicate significance based on post hoc pairwise comparisons corrected by the Holm-Bonferroni method at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively.