Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Educ. 2013 Jun;28(2):262–269. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0459-z

Table 2.

Associations between participant characteristics and intervention outcomes (N=47)

Satisfaction with coach, m=27.2; SD=6.3 Communication with coach, m=9.4; SD=1.5 Effectiveness: decision support m=10.6; SD=2.7 Self-efficacy: communication, m=7.5; SD=2.0 Self-efficacy decision, m=7.9; SD=1.6 PICS post-intervention, m=20.7; SD=1.9
Age, r (p values) .02 (.87) .17 (.26) .09 (.55) .18 (.24) 15 (.33) −.47 (.07)
Education: >HS versus ≤HS −2.29 (.25) −.27 (.54) −1.31 (.12) −.81 (.20) −.40 (.41) .97 (.35)
Marital/living: married versus single −.92 (.63) .31 (.50) 1.05 (.20) .76 (.20) .05 (.92) −.37 (.73)
Employment: full time versus other −.89 (.60) −.64 (.20) −.08 (.92) −.81 (.22) −.15 (.78) −.24 (82)
Hormonal receptor (positive versus negative) −.81 (.50) .21 (.75) .36 (.77) .32 (.72) .59 (.40) −1.17 (.30)
Surgery (mastectomy versus lumpectomy) .89 (.60) −.44 (.42) .46 (.65) .05 (.95) .26 (.65) −.71 (49)
Tumor stage: (stages II and III versus I) −1.16 (.53) −.21 (.48) .94 (.38) .25 (.72) .29 (.55) −.67 (.58)
Collectivism, r (p values) .22 (.20) −.12 (.48) −.17 (.31) −.13 (.46) −.20 (.26) .20 (.49)
World view, r (p values) .07 (.70) .04 (.84) −.02 (.90) .13 (.46) .02 (.90) −.11 (.71)
Discrimination, r (p values) −.09 (.55) .05 (.73) −.04 (.82) −.10 (.50) −.00 (.99) .29 (.28)
Religiosity, r (p values) −.18 (.30) .09 (.60) .12 (.48) .07 (.67) −.05 (.78) −.184 (53)

Values are given as (mean difference, p value) or r (p value)