Table 3.
Comparison of prediction performance based on reaction-diffusion model and the proposed coupling model: volume difference, TPVF and FPVF.
| Study #1 | Study #2 | Study #3 | Study #4 | Study #5 | Summary | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor1 | Tumor2 | Tumor3 | Tumor1 | Tumor2 | Tumor1 | Tumor1 | Tumor1 | |||
| VolDif | Reaction-diffusion model | 4.1% | 5.1% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 5.7% | 5.5% | 6.1% | 5.2% | 5.1% |
| Coupling model | 3.1% | 4.3% | 4.1% | 4.0% | 5.1% | 4.6% | 4.9% | 4.5% | 4.3% | |
| TPVF | Reaction-diffusion model | 91.5% | 90.9% | 91.6% | 92.1% | 90.8% | 90.1% | 89.3% | 90.3% | 90.8% |
| Coupling model | 93.2% | 92.5% | 93.5% | 93.8% | 92.8% | 91.9% | 91.6% | 92.5% | 92.7% | |
| FPVF | Reaction-diffusion model | 4.6% | 4.2% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.8% | 5.3% | 6.1% | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Coupling model | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 3.5% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.1% | |