Table 3. Hierarchical Regression Models Predicting 48-hour Shoulder Pain at Rest, with Motion, and with Isometric Action Using Baseline, Pre-injury Predictors.
Activity-Related Pain | ||||||||||||
Rest-Related Pain | Motion Pain | Isometric Pain | ||||||||||
Beta | P | Δ R2 | P | Beta | P | Δ R2 | P | Beta | P | Δ R2 | P | |
1 | 0.027 | 0.281 | 0.006 | 0.850 | 0.005 | 0.889 | ||||||
Age | 0.025 | 0.785 | <0.001 | 0.996 | −0.027 | 0.771 | ||||||
Sex | −0.163 | 0.065 | 0.071 | 0.423 | −0.011 | 0.902 | ||||||
BMI | −0.016 | 0.867 | 0.013 | 0.890 | −0.049 | 0.605 | ||||||
2 | 0.020 | 0.249 | 0.043 | 0.232 | 0.029 | 0.461 | ||||||
Age | 0.061 | 0.512 | 0.054 | 0.564 | 0.013 | 0.893 | ||||||
Sex | −0.157 | 0.076 | 0.079 | 0.367 | −0.005 | 0.955 | ||||||
BMI | −0.021 | 0.819 | 0.004 | 0.968 | −0.053 | 0.577 | ||||||
PCS | 0.170 | 0.095 | 0.247 | 0.015 | 0.202 | 0.048 | ||||||
TSK-11 | −0.099 | 0.323 | −0.149 | 0.135 | −0.088 | 0.382 | ||||||
3 | 0.017 | 0.338 | 0.076 | 0.021 | 0.207 | <0.001 | ||||||
Age | 0.071 | 0.449 | 0.054 | 0.552 | 0.011 | 0.899 | ||||||
Sex | −0.137 | 0.140 | 0.107 | 0.232 | 0.040 | 0.632 | ||||||
BMI | 0.017 | 0.855 | 0.051 | 0.579 | 0.023 | 0.789 | ||||||
PCS | 0.170 | 0.100 | 0.209 | 0.036 | 0.133 | 0.149 | ||||||
TSK-11 | −0.074 | 0.466 | −0.144 | 0.142 | −0.080 | 0.378 | ||||||
PPT | −0.057 | 0.533 | −0.061 | 0.494 | −0.084 | 0.311 | ||||||
SHPR | 0.083 | 0.384 | 0.285 | 0.002 | 0.472 | <0.001 | ||||||
CPM | 0.128 | 0.186 | 0.041 | 0.665 | 0.056 | 0.527 |
All predictor variables measured at baseline (pre-injury).
Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, CPM = conditioned pain modulation, PCS = Pain Catastrophizing Scale, P = p-value, PPT = pressure pain threshold, SHPR = suprathreshold heat pain response, TSK = Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.